ArticleCureus2025
Spigelian Hernia Following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spigelian hernia (SH) is a rare type of lateral ventral hernia occurring through the Spigelian fascia, accounting for only 0.1-2% of all ventral hernias. Though commonly considered spontaneous, an increasing number of iatrogenic cases have been reported following laparoscopic surgery, particularly when 10-mm trocar ports are used. Due to the anatomical location between the rectus abdominis and semilunar line, SH can be challenging to detect clinically, often presenting with nonspecific symptoms. This is especially true in gynaecologic laparoscopy, where SH remains an underrecognized complication. We present the case of a 70-year-old woman who underwent laparoscopic total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for a benign adnexal mass. Two days postoperatively, the patient developed a tender swelling at the trocar site after straining during defecation. CT imaging revealed a loop of small bowel herniated between abdominal wall muscles, with the fascial stitch still visible. During emergency laparoscopy, as we mobilized the small bowel out of the hernia defect, a bowel rupture was identified in the involved segment, leading to fecal peritonitis and necessitating conversion to open surgery. The patient's postoperative course was complicated by severe aspiration pneumonia requiring ICU admission and prolonged mechanical ventilation, as well as a surgical site infection requiring debridement. This case highlights the diagnostic difficulty and potentially severe complications of trocar-site Spigelian hernias. Even with proper fascial closure, factors such as early postoperative straining, advanced age, and predisposing anatomical defects may contribute to hernia formation. Surgeons should maintain a high level of suspicion in any postoperative patient presenting with localized pain or swelling near trocar sites, particularly lateral to the rectus muscle. Recognizing this uncommon yet potentially serious complication early can ensure early diagnosis and treatment, reducing the risk of morbidity. This report underscores the need for vigilance in gynaecologic laparoscopic practice and serves as a reminder that even well-closed trocar sites can lead to Spiegel hernia and thus culminate in severe complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.