ReviewCureus2025
Diagnostic Performance of Advanced Diffusion MRI Parameters Versus Conventional Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) for Detecting Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate preoperative identification of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in colorectal cancer is essential for optimal staging and treatment planning. Conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is limited by overlap in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between benign and malignant lymph nodes. Advanced diffusion MRI techniques, including intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters (diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f)) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics such as fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), mean diffusivity (MD), and radial diffusivity (RD), may improve diagnostic accuracy. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of these advanced diffusion parameters compared with conventional DWI. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library identified studies assessing diffusion MRI for LNM detection with extractable true-positive, false-positive, false-negative, and true-negative data. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Risk ratios (RRs) were pooled using RevMan (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom), and bivariate summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) analysis was performed in R (R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria). Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2). Five studies involving 239 patients and 358 lymph nodes evaluated IVIM, DTI, ADC, and multiparametric models. IVIM-derived D showed significantly superior performance compared with ADC (RR=9.11, 95% CI: 4.86-17.09; I²=0%), while D* also demonstrated strong discriminatory ability (RR=3.12, 95% CI: 2.10-4.65; I²=0%). SROC analysis revealed high diagnostic accuracy for IVIM D (area under the curve (AUC)≈0.93), moderate accuracy for D* (AUC≈0.82), and the highest accuracy for combined parameters (AUC≈0.95). DTI metrics, particularly FA and AD, consistently showed high sensitivity (88-100%) and specificity (85-100%). Overall risk of bias was low. Advanced diffusion MRI parameters outperform conventional DWI for detecting LNM in colorectal cancer, with multiparametric approaches offering the greatest diagnostic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.