Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583172›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Self-Assessment for Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Case Report.

Ralph J Lamson

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ralph J LamsonStanford Psychiatry Immersive Technology Consortium, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a report on self-assessment using Python, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and machine learning to predict patient readiness for spinal fusion surgery, including an analysis of whether the decision tree model recommended surgery. The case of a 79-year-old retired psychologist (the author) with spinal stenosis, a collapsed L4-L5 disk, and crushed exit spinal nerves is explored. A boosted decision tree was used for prediction, supported by logistic regression and path analysis. Synthetic data were used alongside real patient data to add variability to the dataset. In this study, patient responses to a questionnaire were tested to determine if spine fusion surgery would be recommended. The results are limited by single-case and synthetic data. The model consists of a unique patient data array. Python, AI, and machine learning generated a self-assessment approach that offers patients and healthcare professionals an effective prediction tool. Each year, a substantial number of patients ultimately require spinal surgery after experiencing prolonged or refractory back pain. Self-assessment is a tool for personal decision-making. It adds to a collaborative approach with healthcare providers. Wearable sensors to record spinal disk and nerve pain would be beneficial. In clinical practice, only a small proportion of healthcare AI research incorporates real-world patient data, with most studies relying on simulated or secondary datasets. The case demonstrates the efficacy of synthetic data in predictive modeling, while acknowledging the limitations in generalizing the findings to broader patient populations without real-world data.

Indexed as

ailogistic regressionmental wellbeingpath analysisphysical exercisepsycho-diagnostics & therapyself-assessment toolspinal fusion surgerysynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID41583172
PMCPMC12824976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.