ArticleCureus2025
Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Preeclampsia Using First-Trimester Biomarkers.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for the Prediction of Preeclampsia: Current Evidence, Comparison with Conventional Screening Models, and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia (PE) remains a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early identification of high-risk pregnancies during the first trimester is challenging, as traditional diagnostic methods based on maternal history and blood pressure readings often lack sensitivity. This study proposes an artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive framework that integrates maternal demographic information, biophysical parameters, and first-trimester biochemical markers to enhance the early detection of PE. A curated dataset of first-trimester patient characteristics was used to develop and evaluate machine learning models, including support vector machines (SVM), random forests (RF), and deep neural networks (DNN). The AI framework demonstrated promising predictive performance, with the DNN achieving an accuracy of 93.4% on the held-out test set. Feature importance analysis identified placental growth factor (PlGF), pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) as key contributors to risk classification. While these results exceed the detection rates of traditional first-trimester algorithms such as the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm, we have applied rigorous cross-validation, feature selection, and regularization techniques to mitigate overfitting. Future work will focus on external validation across multicenter cohorts and real-time clinical implementation to assess generalizability and clinical utility. Our findings suggest that AI-driven predictive analytics can support early risk assessment and personalized prenatal management, potentially improving maternal and fetal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.