ArticleInternet interventions2026
Benefits, limitations and potential solutions for defining good practices in Online Counselling Chat Services for Youth.
Article in Internet interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Working Without Faces: Job Demands, Resources, and Burnout in Anonymous Helpline Workers in Slovakia and the Czech Republic-A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Help Is Just a Message Away: Online Counselling Chat Services Bridging Gaps in Youth Mental Health?European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Online Chat Counselling Services (OCCS) provide accessible mental health support for young people. However, systematic, cross-cultural research from the perspective of service providers is needed to improve current practices, guide future development, and share best practices. Aims: This study explores the experiences of OCCS providers and counsellors in four European countries, identifying benefits, limitations, and potential solutions to improve services and inform future best practices. Methods: 62 counsellors or chatline coordinators from 33 OCCS in Belgium, Finland, Hungary, and Spain were interviewed online. A thematic analysis of the outputs from these interviews focused on the benefits, limitations and proposed solutions. Results: Most of the participants were female (80 %). Nearly half of the services (48 %) worked with both paid counsellors and volunteers. Eighteen percent of OCCSs did not request any user information at login. In almost half of the OCCSs, counsellors were able to see whether a user had made contact previously. Six key benefits of OCCS were identified: improved accessibility, anonymity-facilitated disclosure, future-oriented services, chat-based communication advantages, positive counsellor experience, and meaningful user support. Five main limitations emerged: unclear communication, limited resources, anonymity as a barrier, uncertainty-related negative perceptions, and low visibility and utilisation. Proposed solutions included conventional strategies (e.g., enhanced training, referrals, inter-service collaboration) and innovative approaches (e.g., AI integration for risk assessment, translation, and chatbot functionalities). Certain limitations were considered intrinsic to the OCCS model and accepted accordingly. Conclusions: This study explored the experiences of a diverse group of counsellors to identify the key benefits, challenges, and potential solutions within OCCS. The proposed strategies provide a valuable foundation for the cross-national implementation of best practices in this field. Future research should evaluate these recommendations, incorporating the perspectives of service users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.