ReviewBiomaterials research2026
Additive Manufacturing of Polymeric Bioresorbable Stents: A Mechanical Performance Perspective.
Review in Biomaterials research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of biomaterials and additive manufacturing (AM) has revolutionized the design, manufacturing, and clinical applications of permanent and bioresorbable implants. AM offers design flexibility and potential for mass customization but poses challenges for scalable manufacturing. Unlike other high-commodity implantable devices that are already clinically approved, stent AM is still in the early phases of research and development. Here, following the recent Food and Drug Administration approval of Abbott's Esprit stent for below-the-knee use, we examine the current prospects for AM of polymeric stents, specifically focusing on polymeric bioresorbable stent geometry, material composition and mechanical properties, and surface quality, predominantly intended for cardiovascular applications. The advancement of bioresorbable polymeric stents is shown through a comparison with metallic stents commonly used in clinical practice. The different AM techniques used for stent fabrication and the level of currently fabricated bioresorbable stents are reviewed. A road map for translating AM stents from the research laboratory to the clinic is proposed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.