ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms in Large-Diameter Vessels: A Subanalysis From the SESSIA Study.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia future aspects: A meta-analysis of clinical features and treatment strategies.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Pooled it
- Intradural extramedullary spinal epidermoid cyst: a narrative review of predisposing factors, surgical challenges, and outcomes.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Flow diverters are now considered first-line tools for treating intracranial aneurysms. However, few devices are available for patients with large-diameter vessels (LDVs). Hence, we evaluated the performance of the largest diameter Surpass Streamline for aneurysms in LDVs. Methods: We performed a subanalysis of the SESSIA (Safety and Efficacy of the Surpass Streamline for Intracranial Aneurysms) multicenter cohort study of patients treated with Surpass Streamline between 2018 and 2021. Patients in whom a 5-mm diameter Surpass Streamline was implanted were divided into 2 groups according to vessel diameter at the landing zones (LDV, ≥5.3 mm versus non-LDV [N-LDV], <5.3 mm). Efficacy was complete occlusion at final follow-up. Safety was ischemic/hemorrhagic events and mortality up to 30 days. Results: Thirty patients harboring 30 aneurysms were included. Fifteen cases were included per group (LDV versus N-LDV). Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, median aneurysm size (LDV, 11 mm versus N-LDV, 10 mm), and location were similar. Vessel diameters at the proximal (LDV, 5.3 mm versus N-LDV, 4.2 mm; Conclusions: The use of large-diameter flow diverters for treating complex intracranial aneurysms arising in LDVs is technically feasible and safe. Comparative studies evaluating devices suitable for this patient population will provide valuable insights for the best device selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.