Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583029›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2023

Radiomics Features in Contrast-Enhanced and Nonenhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Images Are Associated With High Intracranial Aneurysmal Risk.

Sricharan S Veeturi, Ashrita Raghuram, Jacob Miller, Nandor K Pinter, Sebastian Sanchez, Ammad A Baig, Adnan H Siddiqui, Edgar A Samaniego, Vincent M Tutino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sricharan S VeeturiCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center Buffalo NY.
Ashrita RaghuramDepartment of Neurology University at Iowa Iowa City IA.
Jacob MillerDepartment of Neurology University at Iowa Iowa City IA.
Nandor K PinterDepartment of Neurosurgery University at Buffalo Buffalo NY.
Sebastian SanchezDepartment of Neurology University at Iowa Iowa City IA.
Ammad A BaigDepartment of Neurosurgery University at Buffalo Buffalo NY.
Adnan H SiddiquiCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center Buffalo NY.
Edgar A SamaniegoDepartment of Neurology University at Iowa Iowa City IA.
Vincent M TutinoCanon Stroke and Vascular Research Center Buffalo NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1331-2551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aneurysm wall enhancement is a potential imaging biomarker for risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Variations in the texture of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal could shed light on the underlying pathobiology of the aneurysm wall. Radiomics can help quantify the textural complexity in MRI images, which could lead to better understanding and risk stratification of IAs. Herein, we investigated the potential use of radiomics derived from nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI to identify high-risk IAs and evaluated their performance on different data sets. Methods: We obtained 126 IAs from different centers and extracted radiomics features from nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI for each aneurysm. We then built a random forest model from a part of the 3-T data set to identify high-risk IAs based on the 5-year population, hypertension, age, size of aneurysm, earlier SAH from another aneurysm, site of aneurysm (PHASES) score. We then tested the performance of this model on a part of the same 3-T data set, a 7-T data set, and an external 3-T data set. We also performed multivariate analysis to understand the significance of radiomics features. Results: We found that 75 radiomics features were significantly different between high- and low-risk IAs. The radiomics model had good performance when tested on the 3-T data set (accuracy, 90%; sensitivity, 86%; and specificity, 92%); however, when tested on external data sets, it had a moderate performance (accuracy, 88%; sensitivity, 50%; and specificity, 95% for external 3-T data set; and accuracy, 62%; sensitivity, 27%; and specificity, 100% for 7-T data set). Conclusions: Radiomics derived from nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI show high accuracy in identifying high-risk aneurysms from the same data set and could be used as a tool for quantifying aneurysm wall enhancement.

Indexed as

aneurysm wall enhancementintracranial aneurysmsmagnetic resonance imagingradiomicsrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41583029
PMCPMC12778691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.