Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41583008›Full record

ArticleGeoHealth2026

Surface Variable-Based Machine Learning for Scalable Arsenic Prediction in Undersampled Areas.

Shams Azad, Mason O Stahl, Melinda Erickson, Beck A DeYoung, Craig Connolly, Lawrence Chillrud, Kathrin Schilling, Ana Navas-Acien, Anirban Basu, Brian Mailloux and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shams AzadColumbia Climate School of Columbia University New York NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3683-7761
Mason O StahlDepartment of Geosciences Union College Schenectady NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6379-9890
Melinda EricksonUnited States Geological Survey Mounds View MN USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1117-2866
Beck A DeYoungDepartment of Geosciences Union College Schenectady NY USA.
Craig ConnollyLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University Palisades NY USA.
Lawrence ChillrudDepartment of Electrical Engineering Northwestern University Evanston IL USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0727-0161
Kathrin SchillingColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health New York NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-0298
Ana Navas-AcienColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health New York NY USA.
Anirban BasuColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health New York NY USA.
Brian MaillouxDepartment of Environmental Sciences Barnard College New York NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6646-3428
Benjamin C BostickLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University Palisades NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7513-6469
Steven N ChillrudLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University Palisades NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6685-0401

Funding

True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MATTHEW S PERZANOWSKI · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
Research Experience and Training Coordination CoreP42ES033719 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ana Navas-Acien · 2022 to 2026
$11.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES033719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, private wells are not federally regulated, and many households do not test for Arsenic (As). Chronic exposure is linked with multiple health outcomes, and risk can change sharply over short distances and with well depth. Coarse maps or sparse sampling often miss exceedances. Most existing models operate at ∼1 km resolution and use groundwater chemistry or detailed geologic logs, which limits their use in undersampled areas where improved guidance is most needed. We overcome these limitations by developing a machine learning model for Minnesota, USA, that predicts As exposure risk using only surficial variables from remote sensing and global data sets. Variables related to surface water hydrology and geomorphology are selected based on mechanistic links that control redox conditions and As mobilization. Local training was essential, and surficial geology variables that are more sensitive to local conditions were needed to maximize model accuracy. The resulting complete model was sufficiently sensitive to generate accurate and detailed risk maps and depth profiles of As concentrations above the 10 μg/L maximum contaminant level. Accuracy depended on local training data density. We identified a training data density of 0.07 wells/km

Indexed as

drinking waterexposurehydrologymachine learningprivate wellsprobability mappingpublic healthwell water

Identifiers

PMID41583008
PMCPMC12828343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.