ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2022
Association of Sex With the Use and Outcomes of Carotid Revascularization: A Cohort Study.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke is a leading cause of death that disproportionately affects women. Treating carotid stenosis with carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can prevent ischemic stroke. Yet, the sex-specific use and long-term outcomes of these interventions remain unclear. Thus, we sought to investigate sex-based differences in the treatment and outcomes of carotid stenosis. Methods: We analyzed carotid revascularizations in the Vascular Quality Initiative, a national clinical registry. Patients were linked to Medicare claims to identify long-term outcomes. Our study cohort included patients undergoing index CAS or CEA between 2005 and 2015 who were fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65+. The primary exposure was sex, and the primary outcome was stroke. Using log-binomial regression, we estimated the relative risk for CAS treatment accounting for clustering by center. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio for stroke. We used inverse probability-weighted risk adjustment based on patient demographics, comorbidities, and disease severity for all analyses. Results: In our cohort of 22 341 eligible patients, 39% were women, 13% underwent CAS, and the median survival time was 2.6 years (interquartile range: 1.0-3.4 years). After risk adjustment, women were less likely to undergo CAS than men (adjusted relative risk, 0.89; [95% CI, 0.83-0.96]; Conclusion: Compared with men, women had a higher incidence of postoperative stroke after carotid revascularization, regardless of treatment type. Sex disparities in postrevascularization stroke rates may give rise to concern given the widespread use of revascularization for managing carotid stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.