Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41582962›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2022

Decision-Making in Seeking Emergency Care for Stroke Symptoms.

Jenny Andersson, Sofie Jakobsson, Åsa Rejnö, Per-Olof Hansson, Susanne J Nielsen, Lena Björck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jenny AnderssonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Sofie JakobssonInstitute of Health and Care Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Åsa RejnöUniversity West Sweden.
Per-Olof HanssonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Susanne J NielsenDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Lena BjörckDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4827-4559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that rapid treatment for stroke, especially ischemic stroke, reduces mortality and disability. The focus has mainly been on reducing time from arrival at hospital to start of treatment. However, the main reason for delay is often time from symptom onset to arrival at hospital. This study therefore aimed to explore decision-making processes after the onset of stroke symptoms in patients experiencing a first-time stroke. Methods: We included 36 patients aged 18 and older, all of whom were hospitalized with a first-time stroke between October 2018 and April 2020. All patients were interviewed once within 4 weeks of symptom onset and before hospital discharge. Eligible patients were identified retrospectively through a targeted review of medical records. The data were collected and analyzed according to the grounded theory methodology. Results: In total, 43 potential patients were identified and asked to participate. Overall, 36 patients were included in the study: 17 women (median age 77.0 years, interquartile range 17.5) and 19 men (median age 65.7 years, interquartile range 17.2). All interviewees felt fear, and this affected their decision to seek emergency care. The decision-making processes were described by the core category of "Acting on fear." The reason for feeling frightened determined the actions taken. The reasons were sorted into 3 main categories: (1) "seeking care"-recognized stroke symptoms and acted immediately; (2) "pending and reluctance"-suspected stroke but awaited to seek care; and (3) "seeking an explanation"-confused by symptoms. Conclusion: We found that decision-making when experiencing stroke symptoms was complex. All patients felt fear, which determined their actions. Some patients knew about stroke symptoms and acted immediately. Others suspected stroke but still chose to wait, whereas others were confused and tried to find answers. These results could contribute to form future awareness campaigns.

Indexed as

decision‐makinggrounded theoryprehospital delayqualitative methodologystroke symptoms

Identifiers

PMID41582962
PMCPMC12778839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.