Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41582959›Full record

ArticleEJVES vascular forum2026

Retroperitoneal Abdominal Aortic Repair With the da Vinci Single Port System: A Porcine Model Feasibility Study.

Toshio Takayama, Hubert Stein, Hideaki Obara, Toshifumi Kudo, Mark Preuß, Rouven Berndt, Sebastian Eike Debus, Takayuki Komiya, Hiroyuki Kaneta, Fabien Thaveau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Toshio TakayamaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hubert SteinOffice of Clinical Strategy/Surgical Applications Engineering, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
Hideaki ObaraDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshifumi KudoDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mark PreußDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Rouven BerndtDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sebastian Eike DebusDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Takayuki KomiyaOffice of Clinical Strategy/Surgical Applications Engineering, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
Hiroyuki KanetaOffice of Clinical Strategy/Surgical Applications Engineering, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
Fabien ThaveauDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Gabriel Montpied University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Robotic surgery is rarely used in vascular surgery but has demonstrated significant potential compared with open or laparoscopic techniques in reports of abdominal aortic surgery. Enabling a standardised retroperitoneal approach (RPA) to abdominal aortic repair might reduce the peri-operative mortality and morbidity rates associated with a transabdominal approach. The aim of this experimental study was to establish surgical techniques for robotically assisted infrarenal abdominal aortic repair using a single port RPA. Methods: Retroperitoneal abdominal aortic repair was performed in four live porcine models by a group of experienced and novice robotic surgeons. The procedures were performed using the da Vinci SP (single port) surgical system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Polytetrafluoroethylene grafts (W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Newark, DE, USA) were implanted after aortic resection. Operating times for the main procedure steps were recorded. Results: Abdominal aortic repair was feasible in all porcine models applying an RPA through a single incision with the da Vinci SP system. Creating the retroperitoneal access and docking the da Vinci SP was quick, with durations ranging from eight to 20 minutes. Proximal and distal anastomoses were completed in 26 minutes (range 19-33 minutes) and 31.3 minutes (range 23-42 minutes), respectively. In porcine models 2-4, the anastomoses were patent without haemorrhage, with aortic pulsations confirmed on release of the cross clamps. Porcine model 1 was pulseless owing to uncontrolled haemorrhage caused by left external iliac artery penetration at the end of the procedure, and patency could not be tested. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal single port robotic aortic repair was technically feasible with high accuracy in live porcine models. Anastomotic times were reasonable and surgeon comfort level was adequate, which may enable transfer into clinical routine in the future when true clinical benefits will need to be proven in additional studies.

Indexed as

Abdominal aortic aneurysmAorto-iliac occlusive diseaseda Vinci SPRetroperitonealRoboticSingle port

Identifiers

PMID41582959
PMCPMC12828745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.