Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41582942›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Biomechanics of medial meniscus tears in the context of pain: a finite element analysis.

Karol Daszkiewicz, Piotr Łuczkiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karol DaszkiewiczDepartment of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdańsk, Poland.
Piotr ŁuczkiewiczII Clinic of Orthopaedics and Kinetic Organ Traumatology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Meniscal tears represent the most common knee pathology and may be associated with pain. Meniscal pain is caused by direct mechanical stimulation of nociceptors located in the outer, vascular part of the meniscus. Due to difficulties in selecting the optimal surgical treatment, the aim of the study was to analyze the influence of meniscal tears on the stress state in the context of meniscal pain. Methods: Radial, oblique, longitudinal and horizontal tears involving up to 90% of the width of the medial meniscus were modelled using the finite element method. Two types of knee joint loading were simulated: the stance phase of the gait cycle and external tibial rotation combined with compression. Results: The highest Tresca equivalent stresses were obtained for the radial tear of the posterior horn. The largest increase in mean shear stress (187%) on the outer surface of the meniscus, relative to the intact meniscus model, was observed for the oblique tear. Neither complete nor partial horizontal tears were associated with changes in shear stress in the innervated part of the meniscus. Discussion: Increased shear stresses in the innervated part of the meniscus, which may result in pain, were obtained in radial and oblique meniscal tears models. In the longitudinal tear model, instability of the inner part of the meniscus and increased shear stress were observed in the central part of the meniscus and at both ends of the tear.

Indexed as

finite elementkneemedial meniscusmeniscal tearnociceptorspain

Identifiers

PMID41582942
PMCPMC12827652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.