ArticleArchivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascular
Vascular ring due to double aortic arch as a cause of stridor and dysphagia in infancy: a case report.
Article in Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascular. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A double aortic arch is a rare congenital vascular anomaly with clinical significance in the pediatric population due to its potential to cause extrinsic compression of the trachea and esophagus. It should be suspected in infants with persistent respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms refractory to conventional treatment. We report the case of a 2-year-7-month-old boy presenting with recurrent stridor, repeated respiratory infections, and progressive dysphagia. Cardiac CT angiography revealed a complete vascular ring causing tracheoesophageal compression. Dominance of the left aortic arch was identified, and surgical section and distal ligation of the non-dominant right arch were performed, without direct intervention on the tracheoesophageal structures. At the 12-month follow-up, there was complete resolution of symptoms and nutritional recovery. This case highlights the importance of maintaining high clinical suspicion and ensuring timely referral. Even when surgical correction is delayed, appropriate intervention can reverse symptoms and improve quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.