SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Return to sport following Lisfranc injuries in elite athletes-2024 International Foot and Ankle Sports Consensus and systematic review.
Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial commentary: Anatomical insights, diagnostic challenges and evolving treatment strategies for midfoot sporting injuries in elite athletes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Return to Sports in Recreational Athletes After Complex Elbow Dislocation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLisfranc injuries, also referred to as tarsometatarsal joint injuries, are relatively uncommon within the general population and can possess profound clinical implications, especially for elite athletes. Existing follow-up and return to sport (RTS) protocols remain poorly defined and variable based on surgeon preference or institutional protocols. The purpose of this study was to both perform a systematic review and determine if consensus on postoperative protocols and RTS timelines could be reached among an expert panel of orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons who manage Lisfranc injuries in the elite athlete.
methodsThe systematic review evaluated the post-operative management of sports-related Lisfranc injuries. A consensus process was then conducted using a modified Delphi technique with four rounds of questionnaires. General consensus was defined as 75%-85% agreement, strong consensus as 86%-99% agreement and unanimous consensus as 100% agreement.
resultsThe systematic review found patients with ligament Lisfranc injuries were permitted to begin weightbearing at an average of 3.5 weeks. The mean time for these athletes to RTS was 8.9 months. Those with bony Lisfranc injuries were allowed to partially weightbear at 4.5 weeks, on average. Bony Lisfranc injuries treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) allowed the athlete to RTSs at a median of 8 weeks (range 3-12 weeks). There are nine consensus statements presented that illustrate the expected follow-up and RTS milestones. There was unanimous agreement that the athlete can expect to return to their sport 4-6 months postoperatively and athletes with unstable ligament injuries can expect to return to full weightbearing 8-12 weeks postoperatively.
conclusionsThis study integrates expert consensus and systematic review findings to establish evidence-based guidelines for returning athletes to sport following Lisfranc injuries. Consensus and literature findings aligned, indicating that most athletes progress to full weightbearing by 8-12 weeks and RTS within 4-6 months postoperatively. Over 90% of athletes successfully resumed play, underscoring the effectiveness of structured, phase-based rehabilitation. These data provide a standardised framework to guide clinicians in optimising recovery and ensuring a safe, efficient RTS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.