ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Vertical optokinetic eye movements in the larval zebrafish.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptional profiling of extraocular motor neurons revealsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Larval zebrafish maintain elevation with multisensory control of posture and locomotion.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- Larval zebrafish maintain elevation with multisensory control of posture and locomotion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The optokinetic response (OKR), a reflex enabling stable visual processing by minimizing retinal slip, has been well characterized in teleosts over the last decades. Although previous work on teleost OKR mostly focused on its horizontal component, mammals are known to perform vertical and torsional OKR in addition to horizontal OKR. In this study, we characterized the vertical optokinetic response (vOKR) in larval zebrafish and compared it with the horizontal OKR (hOKR) and the vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex (vVOR). Our simultaneous camera-based tracking of vertical and horizontal eye positions revealed a distinct vOKR in larval zebrafish, but with a much smaller dynamic range compared with the hOKR and without any quick phases (resetting saccades). When presented with constant roll-rotating visual stimuli, zebrafish exhibited a brief initial vertical eye rotation in the direction of the stimulus, followed by a period without further slow phase response and interspersed with only spontaneous saccades. This behavior contrasts sharply with the periodical occurrence of resetting saccades (quick phases) during hOKR. The initial vertical response is tuned to similar spatial frequencies and angular velocities as the hOKR. We furthermore showed that the vVOR has a much larger vertical dynamic range than the vOKR, demonstrating that the neuronal circuitry itself - and not the oculomotor plant - is the limiting factor. Although it is unclear whether the observed differences in vertical versus horizontal optokinetic control have an adaptive value for zebrafish, the identified differences are drastic and informative for further studies on visuomotor circuits in teleosts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.