Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41582624›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Vertical optokinetic eye movements in the larval zebrafish.

David-Samuel Burkhardt, Gabriel Möller, Laurian Deligand, Christiane Fichtner, Tim C Hladnik, Aristides B Arrenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transcriptional profiling of extraocular motor neurons revealsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David-Samuel BurkhardtWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Institute for Neurobiology, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-7829-4913
Gabriel MöllerWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Institute for Neurobiology, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8731-4330
Laurian DeligandWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Institute for Neurobiology, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-8593-7362
Christiane FichtnerWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Institute for Neurobiology, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-5208-7456
Tim C HladnikWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Institute for Neurobiology, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9325-2087
Aristides B ArrenbergWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Institute for Neurobiology, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8262-7381

Funding

Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optokinetic response (OKR), a reflex enabling stable visual processing by minimizing retinal slip, has been well characterized in teleosts over the last decades. Although previous work on teleost OKR mostly focused on its horizontal component, mammals are known to perform vertical and torsional OKR in addition to horizontal OKR. In this study, we characterized the vertical optokinetic response (vOKR) in larval zebrafish and compared it with the horizontal OKR (hOKR) and the vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex (vVOR). Our simultaneous camera-based tracking of vertical and horizontal eye positions revealed a distinct vOKR in larval zebrafish, but with a much smaller dynamic range compared with the hOKR and without any quick phases (resetting saccades). When presented with constant roll-rotating visual stimuli, zebrafish exhibited a brief initial vertical eye rotation in the direction of the stimulus, followed by a period without further slow phase response and interspersed with only spontaneous saccades. This behavior contrasts sharply with the periodical occurrence of resetting saccades (quick phases) during hOKR. The initial vertical response is tuned to similar spatial frequencies and angular velocities as the hOKR. We furthermore showed that the vVOR has a much larger vertical dynamic range than the vOKR, demonstrating that the neuronal circuitry itself - and not the oculomotor plant - is the limiting factor. Although it is unclear whether the observed differences in vertical versus horizontal optokinetic control have an adaptive value for zebrafish, the identified differences are drastic and informative for further studies on visuomotor circuits in teleosts.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsNystagmus, OptokineticReflex, Vestibulo-OcularZebrafishAnimalsLarvaPhotic StimulationDanio rerioOculomotor circuitsVertical eye movementsVertical optokinetic responseVertical vestibulo-ocular response

Identifiers

PMID41582624
PMCPMC13091498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.