ReviewAllergy2026
Early Risk Assessment and Recognition of Allergies in Children: Rationale, Methodology, and Proposed Algorithms.
Review in Allergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and risk factors of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis among schoolchildren in Sri Lanka.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Early Risk Assessment and Recognition of Allergies in Children: Rationale, Methodology, and Proposed Algorithms.Allergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtopic diseases-including atopic dermatitis (AD), food allergy (FA), allergic rhinitis (AR), and asthma-are the most common chronic conditions in childhood and adolescence, affecting up to 30% of the global population. In Germany alone, more than 2.1 million children and adolescents are affected. These conditions frequently coexist and share common genetic, environmental, dietary, and microbial risk factors.
methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted, and a multidisciplinary Task Force of the German Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA) and the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) developed consensus-based algorithms for early risk assessment and recognition of allergies in children in already existing preventive medical check-ups. The approach emphasizes stepwise risk assessment, including family history, environmental exposures, and early clinical signs such as recurrent wheezing.
resultsFor children identified as at risk for or with early clinical signs of atopy, targeted diagnostic steps are recommended that follow the national/international guidelines for the management of the suspected atopic disease. This may include general and specific recommendations for nutrition, measurement of specific sensitization and selected biomarkers, if indicated and recommended by the guidelines. Routine allergy testing in asymptomatic children is not recommended. The algorithms are designed to be embedded into routine pediatric check-ups, enabling systematic and early identification of children at increased risk or with early clinical signs of atopic diseases. Early recognition and management can reduce disease severity, improve quality of life, and decrease healthcare costs.
conclusionStructured programs for early risk assessment and recognition of allergies in children are currently lacking but can provide substantial clinical and economic benefits. Integration into routine pediatric preventive examinations, supported by standardization, interdisciplinary collaboration, and sustainable funding, offers a promising strategy to improve long-term outcomes for affected children and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.