ReviewJournal of community genetics2026
The impacts of pricing and reimbursement policies on access to cell and gene therapies across Europe.
Review in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Post-Authorisation Maze: Mapping of European Pharmaceutical Market Access Pathways in the Early JCA Era.Journal of market access & health policy · 2026Article
- Engineering the future of advanced therapy medicinal products: a bioengineering call to action.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Clinical translation of CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutics in cancer and inherited genetic disorders.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing number of expensive cell- and gene-based therapies (CGT) on the market have raised concerns regarding equal patient access, regarding both affordability and timely access. Health Technology Assessments (HTA) and Managed Entry Agreements (MEA) play a pivotal role in pricing and reimbursement (P&R) decisions for expensive drugs in Europe, aiming to ensure patient access while optimizing resource allocation. However, discrepancies in HTA and P&R processes lead to delayed, unequal or lack of access in different countries, exacerbating health inequalities across Europe. Though they facilitate access, MEAs introduce additional delays in pricing and reimbursement discussions, and their lack of transparency increases administrative burden and encourages pricing inequity, negatively affecting healthcare system sustainability. Recent legislative changes under Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 have established the Health Technology Assessment Coordination Group (HTACG), which will oversee mandatory joint clinical assessments in the coming years. This new legislation aims to streamline HTA processes across the EU. To address the ethical imperative of improving access equality for CGT in Europe, we propose further policy reforms including concurrent HTA, early benefit assessment, and incorporation of additional elements of value in HTA evaluations, alongside current initiatives to increase cross-border collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.