ArticleScientific reports2026
A time-coupled multi-objective distributionally robust chance-constrained framework for grid resilience enhancement using mobile emergency generators.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a time-coupled, multi-objective distributionally robust chance-constrained (MODRCC) framework for resilient grid restoration using Mobile Emergency Generators (MEGs). The model unifies (i) time-expanded logistics for MEG routing, crew scheduling, and refuelling, (ii) islanding-feasible DC-OPF under line outages, and (iii) Wasserstein-ball ambiguity to hedge uncertainty in attack severity and travel-time delays. Disjunctive linearization and second-order-cone (SOC) embeddings yield a tractable MISOCP that is evaluated inside an NSGA-II evolutionary search to generate the Pareto frontier between total cost and resilience. Experiments on IEEE-24 and IEEE-118 (12-hour horizon, 24 periods) show that, at comparable budgets, the proposed method reduces expected unserved energy (EUE) by 14-20% relative to static DRCC and classical robust baselines. On the IEEE-118 case, representative operating points illustrate a ~ 54% decrease in EUE (92→42 MWh) for a ~ 10% increase in cost along the frontier, evidencing smooth, convex trade-offs induced by Wasserstein regularization. The solver stack (Gurobi 12.0 + NSGA-II) scales efficiently; with parallel fitness evaluation it converges in ~ 2.8 h for IEEE-118 (16 MEGs). Results confirm that explicitly coupling mobility realism with distributionally robust modelling yields operationally credible, cost-aware restoration schedules suitable for disaster-prone regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.