ArticleJournal of community genetics2026
Young adult perspectives regarding receiving medically actionable gene testing results for newborns: A qualitative investigation.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the United States, standard newborn screening identifies medically treatable conditions in about 1 in 300 newborns. The integration of whole genome sequencing (WGS) into newborn screening programs has the potential to identify a wide variety of medically actionable conditions. Yet, some scholars caution about disclosing medically actionable genes (MAGs) of children to their parents. Given that young adults are future parents, understanding their views on receiving MAGs results for newborns is as important as they are currently poorly understood. To address this gap, we explored young adult perspectives toward receiving MAGs results from WGS for their newborns. We conducted semi-structured individual interviews with 58 young adults, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using an inductive content analysis approach. Most participants expressed a willingness to receive MAG results, citing prevention of future diseases and parental responsibility as key motivators. A few participants were unwilling to receiving MAGs results, primarily due to the worries that the results would overwhelm parents and cause stress and anxiety, their concerns about the young age of their newborn, and a perceived lack of necessity. The findings of this study expand the limited research in WGS and informs policy discussions surrounding the returning of MAGs results as an aspect of WGS-based newborn screening programs. Although the majority of young adults reported favorable attitudes about receiving MAGs results, some concerns raised should be considered in the development of policies for implementing WGS in newborn screening programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.