Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41582236›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026

Characteristics of infant deaths with positive hair toxicology.

N Thomson, J Fronczek, M Lynch, J L Schumann

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N ThomsonDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Southbank, VIC, Australia.
J FronczekDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Southbank, VIC, Australia. Judith.fronczek@vifm.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6159-9374
M LynchDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Southbank, VIC, Australia.
J L SchumannDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Southbank, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI) is the term given to all unexpected infant deaths, comprising accidental, non-accidental and natural deaths including Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). As in other developed countries, Australian SUDI rates are relatively low, but incidence rates have remained essentially unchanged since 2004. To increase our understanding of these deaths, we reviewed a cohort of SUDI cases with positive hair toxicology, focussing on toxicology results, pathology findings, and SIDS risk factors. All infant deaths between 1st January 2014 and 31st of December 2023 with positive hair toxicology in the state of Victoria, Australia, were reviewed for toxicology results, pathology findings and SIDS risk factors. A total of 99 infant deaths met the selection criteria. At least one SIDS risk factor was reported in every case, with a median of 5 per case, highlighting that these infants likely had a high cumulative risk for SIDS. Co-sleeping was most common, reported in over 75% of cases. Polysubstance use was high (87%), with a median of 4 drugs detected per case. Methylamphetamine was detected in hair in over half of cases (n = 57, 58%). Postmortem findings including serious illnesses, like pneumonia (p = 0.002), significant neuropathology (p = 0.002 and p = 0.035), low head circumference (< 15th percentile) (p = 0.035) and low body weight (< 15th percentile) (p = 0.022 and p = 0.011) were all positively correlated with drug exposure in hair. Infants with positive hair toxicology appear to have a high cumulative risk for SIDS, which may reflect a chaotic home environment. Most postmortem findings were positively correlated with drug exposure.

Indexed as

Drug exposureHair toxicologyInfant deathPathologySudden infant death syndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.