ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Self-perceived Ability to Understand Speech does not Influence CRC Screening Adherence Among Sign Language Users.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking Communication Barriers: Educational Attainment in Cervical Cancer Screening Among American Sign Language Users.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) through screening improves survival and reduces mortality, yet adherence is shaped by education and communication barriers. Such systemic barriers are relevant for the deaf, deafblind, and hard of hearing (DDBHH) population using American Sign Language (ASL). While educational attainment is closely linked to cancer screening, less is understood about whether an individual's self-perceived ability to communicate in spoken language settings influences screening behavior. In this study, we examine 'functional hearing ability,' defined as a person's self-perception of their ability to understand what someone says in a quiet room, and its relationship to CRC screening adherence. Using the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey in ASL and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) CRC screening guidelines, we surveyed 600 ASL-using adults from July 2023 to June 2025. Multivariable logistic regression tested associations between self-perceived ability to understand spoken language in a quiet room (understand well vs. cannot understand well in a quiet room) and screening adherence, adjusting for age, education, their interaction, race, and marital status. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Functional hearing ability was not significantly associated with CRC screening [OR 0.86 (95% CI: 0.58-1.27); p = 0.44]. However, the interaction between age and education remained significant (p = 0.04). College graduates were more likely to follow screening guidelines compared to non-graduates, though this benefit diminished with age [age 45-54: OR 2.47 (1.30-4.70); 55-64: OR 1.25 (0.72-2.17); 65-74: OR 0.75 (0.39-1.46)]. Hispanic [OR 0.80 (0.53-1.19)] and Other races [OR 0.50 (0.31-0.80)] were also less likely to be screened than White participants (p = 0.02). Findings suggest functional hearing ability, defined as perceived ability to understand a speaker in a quiet room, alone does not predict screening adherence. Addressing educational disparities, through ASL-fluent community health workers or patient navigators, may improve increasing CRC screening rates in the DDBHH community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41582234What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.