ArticleScientific reports2026
Software application in early blight detection in tomatoes using modified MobileNet architecture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an automated framework for early blight detection in tomato plants using a modified MobileNet architecture. Addressing the limitations of traditional labor-intensive methods, this study proposes a two-stage pipeline combining (1) transfer learning with depthwise separable convolutions for efficient feature extraction and (2) a meta-learned ensemble of Random Forest, SVM, and Gradient Boosting classifiers to handle real-world variability in lighting and environmental conditions. The approach introduces two custom convolutional layers (Custom_Feature_Extraction_Block) that improve F1-score by + 3.8 points over the MobileNet baseline, with the ensemble contributing an additional + 2.1 points. Evaluated on a balanced PlantVillage dataset (1,982 images) with extensive augmentation to simulate variable lighting and orientations, the system achieved up to 100% accuracy with selected classifiers on a held-out validation subset of 30 images under controlled conditions. To assess generalization, we further validated the framework on an independent dataset (tomato_dataset_v2, 30, 609 images, 10 classes) containing field-acquired tomato leaf images, where the model attained 94.5% accuracy, confirming robustness beyond control environments. Comparative analysis with 10 recent methods demonstrates superior accuracy-efficiency trade-offs, offering practical on-device decision support for smallholder farmers. The framework’s lightweight design (4.2 M parameters, 23 ms/image on Raspberry Pi 4) and validated scalability underscore its potential for mobile and drone-based agricultural deployment. This addresses critical needs in global food security through accessible plant disease detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.