Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41582200›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2026

Viral manipulation of vector behaviour: cucumber mosaic virus has differential effects on specialist versus generalist aphids infesting Arabidopsis thaliana.

Hana Azuma, Alex M Murphy, Nik J Cunniffe, Arden G Berlinger, John P Carr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hana AzumaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.
Alex M MurphyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2226-8759
Nik J CunniffeDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3533-8672
Arden G BerlingerDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.
John P CarrDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK. jpc1005@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-2160

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council APP65186Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W510609/1Leverhulme Trust RPG-2022-134Royal Society ICA\R1\201221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCucumber mosaic virus (CMV) is vectored by aphids. Infection of Arabidopsis thaliana plants with CMV affects their attractiveness to aphids (Myzus persicae) and the performance of aphids confined on these plants. CMV-induced changes in plant-aphid interactions ('viral manipulation') may promote transmission. M. persicae, an efficient CMV vector is a 'generalist', i.e., it has many plant hosts. A. thaliana is also exploited by crucifer-specialist aphids including Lipaphis erysimi (an efficient CMV vector) and Brevicoryne brassicae (a poor CMV vector). We explored the hypothesis that CMV-induced viral manipulation of aphid behaviour would exert stronger effects on M. persicae than on crucifer-specialists.

resultsM. persicae, B. brassicae and L. erysimi were released in microcosms and allowed to choose to settle on either CMV-infected or mock-inoculated plants. Initial experiments showed that as systemic CMV infection developed in A. thaliana, aphids of M. persicae were decreasingly likely to settle on infected plants. In subsequent experiments, using plants at 14 days post-infection, it was found that aphids of M. persicae were faster to choose between infected and uninfected plants than specialist aphids, but that both the generalist and specialists were less likely to settle on CMV-infected plants. Olfactometry showed that volatiles emitted by CMV-infected plants attracted M. persicae, and although the specialists showed no significant preferences, greater numbers of aphids of all three species responded when CMV-infected plant volatiles were presented to them.

conclusionsAs CMV infection develops, A. thaliana becomes less susceptible to aphid colonisation, however, plants continue to emit attractive olfactory cues. This is consistent with a model in which aphids are attracted to infected plants but discouraged from settling (e.g., by gustatory cues), which encourages aphids to carry CMV to non-infected plants. CMV appears to be more successful in manipulating the interactions of A. thaliana with the generalist aphid M. persicae, than with the crucifer specialists B. brassicae or L. erysimi.

Indexed as

AphidsArabidopsisCucumovirusInsect VectorsPlant DiseasesAnimalsHost-Pathogen InteractionsAttract-and-DeterLatent periodNeural-ConstraintsNon-persistent transmissionSequential-CuesVirally induced plant phenotypeViral suppressor of RNA silencing

Identifiers

PMID41582200
PMCPMC12914952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.