ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Minimally invasive vs. microscopic discectomy for adolescent lumbar disc herniation: a comparative study of clinical and spinopelvic outcomes.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic spine surgery across the pediatric pathological spectrum: A systematic review of indications, techniques, and outcomes.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent lumbar disc herniation (ALDH) represents 0.6-6.8% of all lumbar disc herniation cases, yet comparative studies of surgical techniques in this population remain limited. This study compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of three surgical approaches for ALDH.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed by reviewing medical records of 150 adolescents with single-level L4-L5 lumbar disc herniation who received surgical treatment between January 2021 and July 2023. Patients were divided into three groups according to the surgical technique performed: microscopic fenestration discectomy (FD, n = 50), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD, n = 50), or unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE, n = 50). The surgical approach was determined by the attending surgeon based on patient characteristics, herniation type, and surgeon expertise. Outcome measures included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and spinopelvic parameters. Clinical assessments were performed preoperatively and at multiple postoperative intervals with mean follow-up of 33.5 months.
resultsAll groups demonstrated significant improvement in pain and functional outcomes. PELD showed superior perioperative advantages with shorter hospital stay (5.10 ± 0.42 vs. 7.68 ± 2.30 vs. 7.80 ± 1.36 days, p < 0.01) and operative time (81.36 ± 20.35 vs. 113.36 ± 14.86 vs. 118.26 ± 12.68 min, p < 0.01). UBE demonstrated lowest blood loss (228.64 ± 47.77 ml, p < 0.01). Early postoperative differences in VAS, JOA, and ODI scores converged by 6-month follow-up. Spinopelvic parameters showed significant improvements in pelvic tilt and sacral slope following minimally invasive procedures.
conclusionsAll three techniques provide effective symptom relief for ALDH. PELD offers rapid recovery advantages, while UBE minimizes surgical trauma. FD provides technical simplicity but may compromise long-term spinal biomechanics. Technique selection should consider individual patient factors and surgeon expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.