ReviewBMC surgery2026
Laparoscopic management of a rare intrahepatic bile duct variation in a patient with cholelithiasis: a case report and review of the literature.
Review in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnatomical variations of the biliary system constitute one of the principal risk factors for bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Preoperative imaging modalities, such as abdominal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), play a pivotal role in identifying potential biliary anatomical variations. In addition, meticulous adherence to standardized surgical techniques during LC serves as a critical safeguard against BDI. Therefore, heightened awareness and comprehensive understanding of biliary anatomical variations are essential for preventing intraoperative injury and mitigating the risk of severe, potentially irreversible postoperative complications. CASE PRESENTATION: This report presents the case of a 37-year-old female patient admitted with symptomatic cholelithiasis accompanied by cholecystitis. Preoperative MRCP revealed an anatomical variation of the intrahepatic bile ducts. Following multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation, a detailed surgical plan was established. LC was subsequently performed, during which the biliary variation was carefully identified and preserved. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged in good condition.
conclusionThis case illustrates the value of preoperative MRCP in selected patients for identifying anatomical biliary variations, as well as the importance of MDT discussion and the development of a detailed surgical plan. During the procedure, the surgeon employed precise and adaptable operative techniques to successfully preserve the variant bile duct. Analysis of this case highlights that ongoing enhancement of surgeons’ understanding of biliary anatomy—particularly anatomical variations and their surgical implications—is essential. A solid knowledge of biliary anatomy provides a crucial theoretical foundation for preventing intraoperative BDI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.