ArticleEJNMMI research2026
Quantitative assessment of graves' ophthalmopathy activity using
Article in EJNMMI research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGraves' ophthalmopathy (GO) is a challenging autoimmune manifestation of Graves' disease, whose management relies on accurate assessment of inflammatory activity in the extraocular muscles (EOMs). The Clinical Activity Score (CAS), the current gold standard for assessing disease activity, is based on subjective clinical signs. Consequently, objective imaging biomarkers are urgently needed as a complement orbital
resultsGroup Differences: EOM uptake values for all four indices were significantly higher in the active GO group than in both the inactive and control groups (all P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the inactive and control groups. CLINICAL CORRELATION: All quantitative parameters showed significant positive correlations with the CAS (all p < 0.001). DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE: ROC curve analysis confirmed that all indices effectively differentiated active from inactive GO, with SUV
conclusionsIn summary, this study confirms that quantitative indices from orbital
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.