ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
The hidden crisis: a multinational analysis of neurosurgical residency training in Latin America.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurosurgery residency in Latin America is a rigorous and demanding process, often characterized by prolonged working hours, variable access to academic resources and inconsistent institutional support. While global discussions on resident well-being, workload regulation and burnout prevention are advancing, there remains limited multicenter, region-specific data on these issues in Latin America. This study aimed to evaluate the training conditions, mental health, mentorship availability and access to educational resources among neurosurgery residents across the region. Multinational cross-sectional survey conducted July 3rd - August 8th 2025 among neurosurgery residents in Latin America. The survey was disseminated through institutional mailing lists, professional networks, WhatsApp groups, Telegram channels and direct outreach. Inclusion criteria were active enrollment in an accredited neurosurgery residency program within Latin America; exclusion criteria included neurosurgery residents from Latin America training outside the region. The questionnaire covered demographics, workload, academic opportunities, mentorship, technological access, mental health and perceptions of institutional support. Data were analyzed descriptively, with subgroup comparisons where relevant. A total of 511 neurosurgery residents from 20 Latin American countries completed the survey. Most residents assisted in 1-5 cases weekly (60.3%), but 42.7% performed at least one surgery per week as lead surgeon and 29.4% did so two to three times per week. 46.0% of them reported working over 80 h weekly and 12.1% exceeded 100 h. Self-reported burnout markers were widespread: emotional exhaustion (66.3%), sleep disturbance (71.0%) and loss of empathy (58.3%). Training in core procedures was universal for trauma craniotomy (98.2%) and spine surgery (94.1%), however subspecialty exposure was more restricted. Only 11.5% had regular access to cadaver labs or microsurgical simulation and digital/AR/AI-based surgical platform training was virtually absent with 79.6% reporting no exposure. Only 8.2% of residents were in programs where research was mandatory and 40.1% reported having no institutional support for research. This multicenter survey provides one of the most comprehensive insights to date into the working conditions, mental health, academic engagement and institutional support experienced by neurosurgery residents in Latin America. The findings depict a training environment characterized by excessive workloads, variable access to resources and limited structured mentorship, set against a backdrop where burnout and emotional distress are often normalized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.