Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41581996›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2026

Advanced Technologies for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Using Exhaled Breath Samples: A Systematic Scoping Review.

F L Adão-Araújo, B G Ferreira, R Pontarolo, F S Tonin, S M Raboni

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

F L Adão-AraújoPostgraduate Program in Internal Medicine and Health Science, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
B G FerreiraPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
R PontaroloDepartment of Pharmacy, Postgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
F S ToninPharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology Department, Social and Legal Pharmacy Section, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4262-8608
S M RaboniPostgraduate Program in Internal Medicine and Health Science, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7907-7585

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNon-invasive methods based on exhaled breath samples have emerged as promising alternatives for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in settings where sputum collection is challenging and laboratory infrastructure is limited. We aimed to map the evidence on advanced technologies available for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis using alveolar breath, bioaerosols, or exhaled breath condensate.

methodsA comprehensive scoping review following international guidelines was performed (OSF: 10.17605/OSF.IO/TRJ7W). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (June 2025). Primary studies evaluating physical or chemical diagnostic methods based on biological exhaled breath samples for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis in symptomatic patients were included. Studies' metadata, including method accuracy metrics, were extracted for diagnosis performance comparison. Evidence was synthesised using descriptive statistical and qualitative methods.

resultsOverall, 19 studies published between 2010 and 2025 were included, mostly conducted in high tuberculosis-burden countries such as South Africa (16%), China (11%) and Paraguay (11%). The most evaluated techniques were electronic nose (e-nose) (42%), gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS-based) (21%) and machine learning applied to mass spectrometry (ML-MS) approaches (11%). Important heterogeneity in studies' design and analytical approaches was observed. All included studies used non-invasive samples and were classified as intended for screening purposes; none aimed for confirmatory diagnosis. Among the included studies, 10 (53%) were classified as near point-of-care approaches. Of these, 8 (80%) met the minimum sensitivity requirement for screening tests, although only one also achieved the corresponding specificity threshold. The highest diagnostic performance reported showed a sensitivity of 98.5% (95% CI: 92.1-100) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 93.5-100).

conclusionsAlthough research on exhaled breath-based technologies for pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis is advancing, with some alternatives presenting moderate-to-high performance, their implementation still requires standardised validation, methodological improvements and field testing in real-world settings.

Indexed as

Tuberculosis, PulmonaryBreath TestsElectronic NoseHumansSensitivity and Specificityelectronic nosesexhaled breath samplesnon‐invasive diagnosispulmonary tuberculosisscoping review

Identifiers

PMID41581996
PMCPMC13050613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.