GuidelineOral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology2026
American Dental Association and American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology patient selection for dental radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: Clinical recommendations.
Guideline in Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanobiology and Molecular Regulation of Periodontal Tissue Remodeling During Orthodontic Tooth Movement: From Periodontal Phenotype to Precision Orthodontics-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs an update to the 2012 American Dental Association and US Food and Drug Administration "Dental Radiographic Examinations: Recommendations for Patient Selection and Limiting Radiation Exposure," this resource provides decision-making guidance on the use of various imaging modalities for general and pediatric dental care practitioners. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs convened an expert panel of 6 members along with an expert consultant group of 18 members to develop evidence-based guidance on dental imaging. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify relevant systematic reviews and organizational guidelines addressing 9 clinical questions. The recommendations presented were developed by means of a non-Delphi process (ie, reaching consensus through a structured process).
resultsDue to limitations in the available evidence, consensus recommendations rather than formal guidelines were developed. A thorough evaluation of the patient history and clinical findings should precede radiographic examinations. Previously obtained images should be reviewed, and all imaging modalities, especially cone-beam computed tomography, should be used judiciously to minimize cumulative radiation exposure to the patient. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should base imaging decisions on the patient's medical and dental histories, clinical examination findings, disease risk assessment, and the presence of specific clinical conditions. When used appropriately, radiographic imaging contributes to dental treatment decisions and results in optimal patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.