ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2026
Isolation of anaerobic bacteria from bovine mastitis cases in Mombetsu district, Japan.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bovine mastitis is an inflammatory disease of the udder caused by pathogen infection. In case of aerobic cultivation, 30% of milk samples have nonbacterial; this may relate to anaerobic bacteria, although this remains unclear. This study analyzed 173 mastitis milk samples collected via aerobic and anaerobic cultivation. The detection rate by anaerobic culture was significantly higher (P<0.01; 136 samples: 78.6%) than that by aerobic culture (125 samples: 72.3%). Furthermore, the detection rates of Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus uberis, and Trueperella pyogenes were higher in anaerobic than aerobic culture. Clostridium perfringens was detected one sample (0.61%) and Fusobacterium necrophorum in two samples (1.22%) were detected. Overall, these findings indicated the value of anaerobic culture for detecting the causative bacteria of mastitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.