Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41581341›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2026

Profiling the T cell response to polypropylene mesh in a non-human primate sacrocolpopexy model.

Srividya Kottapalli, Marrisa Therriault, Rui Liang, Malini Harinath, Gabby King, Pamela A Moalli, Amanda Artsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Srividya KottapalliUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Marrisa TherriaultDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Rui LiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Malini HarinathDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Gabby KingDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Pamela A MoalliDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Amanda ArtsenDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: artsenam@upmc.edu.

Funding

Porosity and tensioning: Critical factors to consider when choosing a prolapse meshR01HD083383 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ABRAMOWITCH, STEVEN D, MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2016 to 2025
$5.5M
Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health in PittsburghK12AR084218 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JUDITH YANOWITZ · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS K12 AR084218NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polypropylene mesh (PPM) improves anatomic outcomes in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair, yet complications-most commonly pain and mesh exposure-occur in ∼10 % of cases. Clinically, meshes that are implanted flat often demonstrate striking deformation at explanation, including pore collapse and wrinkling. Both computational models and in vivo studies confirm that mesh geometry changes substantially after tensioning during prolapse repair. Although T cells have been implicated in mesh-related complications, the specific impact of mesh deformation on adaptive immunity is not fully understood. To address this gap, a lightweight PPM (Restorelle) was implanted in nonhuman primates either in its flat configuration (stable, R0) or engineered into two progressively deformed geometries: R45 (unstable: pore collapsed) and RD (predeformed: pore collapsed + wrinkled). Sham-operated animals served as controls. Twelve weeks post-implantation, mesh-tissue complexes were analyzed to quantify T-cell phenotypes, tissue remodeling, and downstream healing outcomes. Findings were integrated with a comparative proteomic analysis of flat versus deformed human mesh explants. Mesh burden increased stepwise with deformation (R0 < R45 < RD). Deformation amplified T-cell infiltration within the vaginal adventitia, with helper T cells dominating and cytotoxic T cells contributing minimally. T

Indexed as

PolypropylenesSurgical MeshT-LymphocytesAnimalsFemaleHumansPelvic Organ ProlapsePolypropylenes

Identifiers

PMID41581341
PMCPMC13316529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.