ReviewPlant communications2026
Plant non-canonical peptides: From identification to mechanisms.
Review in Plant communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant peptides have emerged as key regulators of plant growth, development, immunity, and environmental adaptation. Early studies in crops demonstrate the potential application of certain peptides, such as systemin and plant elicitor peptides, to enhance disease resistance. Based on their structure and function, plant peptides are typically classified into canonical peptides, non-canonical peptides, and non-ribosomal peptides. Advances in peptidogenomics and mass spectrometry enable genome-wide discovery of numerous endogenous peptides, including those translated from untranslated regions and non-coding RNAs, greatly expanding the known plant peptidome. This review provides a comprehensive overview of plant peptides, including their classification, biosynthesis, and functional mechanisms in regulating diverse biological processes. Importantly, it systematically summarizes the historical development and recent advances in strategies for plant peptide identification. Despite substantial progress, peptide discovery and functional annotation remain challenging. We therefore propose that integrating high-throughput technologies, functional genomics, and synthetic biology will be essential for unlocking the full potential of plant peptides in crop improvement and cross-disciplinary innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.