ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Patient-specific anatomical alignment relative to the contralateral collodiaphyseal angle as an independent predictor of screw cut-out after proximal femoral nailing.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScrew cut-out remains a major mechanical complication after proximal femoral nailing (PFN) for intertrochanteric fractures. Traditional predictors such as tip-apex distance (TAD) and reduction quality do not account for individual femoral anatomy. This study aimed to determine whether deviation from the contralateral collodiaphyseal (CCD) angle (|Δ angle|) independently predicts screw cut-out after PFN.
methodsA total of 354 patients (mean age 77.6 ± 12.0 years; 58% female) treated with PFN between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiographic parameters included TAD and the absolute difference between postoperative and contralateral collodiaphyseal (CCD) angles (|Δ angle|), representing patient-specific alignment. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score, Barthel Index, and time to full weight bearing. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of screw cut-out.
resultsScrew cut-out occurred in 56 patients (15.8%) and was associated with larger TAD, greater |Δ angle| deviation, and poorer reduction quality (all p < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, TAD, |Δ angle|, and reduction quality independently predicted cut-out. Patients with cut-out exhibited lower functional scores and delayed weight bearing, indicating substantial impairment in postoperative recovery.
conclusionPatient-specific anatomical alignment, along with TAD and reduction quality, independently predicts screw cut-out. Deviations ≥ 9° from native CCD alignment increase mechanical failure risk and delay functional recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.