ArticleBMC psychology2026
The impact of number talks on the number sense of fourth-grade primary school students.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effect of number talks on the number sense of fourth-grade primary school students using a mixed-method design, with particular attention to students with varying levels of initial number sense and perceptions from teachers and students. A quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group was employed in this research. Additionally, both quantitative and qualitative research methods were utilized. The “Fourth-Grade Number Sense Test” was employed to collect quantitative data, while “Interview Forms” were used to gather qualitative data. The study sample comprised 219 fourth-grade students from three primary schools. Before the experimental process, all participants were administered the “Number Sense Scale for 4th Graders” as a pretest, which was subsequently re-administered as a posttest upon completion of the intervention. Data analysis was conducted using t-tests for both dependent and independent samples. To complement the quantitative data, in-depth interviews were conducted with teachers from the experimental group and twenty-two students from the experimental group. The qualitative data obtained were analyzed using descriptive and content analysis techniques. The findings revealed a significant difference in number sense between students in the experimental group, where number talks were implemented, and those in the control group, where they were not, based on pretest and posttest measurements. Moreover, while number talks had no significant impact on students with a high level of number sense, they were found to be effective in improving the number sense of students with lower initial levels. These findings suggest that number talks are an effective and inclusive strategy to enhance number sense development, particularly for lower-performing students, and should be integrated into mathematics instruction and teacher training. Additionally, both teachers and students perceived number talks as distinctive, engaging, instructive, stimulating, and enjoyable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.