Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41580829›Full record

ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2026

Preservative-free latanoprost induces meibomian gland dysfunction through inflammatory and oxidative stress pathways.

Caihong Huang, Yiran Yang, Shinan Wu, Zhaolin Liu, Lin Chen, Dan Yan, Mingyan Wei, Ke Yan, Ruochen Wang, Jiaoyue Hu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Caihong Huang *Xiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine; Eye Institute of Xiamen University; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-An Campus of Xiamen University. South Xiang-An Rd, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China.
Yiran Yang *Xiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine; Eye Institute of Xiamen University; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-An Campus of Xiamen University. South Xiang-An Rd, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China.
Shinan Wu *Xiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine; Eye Institute of Xiamen University; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-An Campus of Xiamen University. South Xiang-An Rd, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China.
Zhaolin LiuXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine; Eye Institute of Xiamen University; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-An Campus of Xiamen University. South Xiang-An Rd, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China.
Lin ChenXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine; Eye Institute of Xiamen University; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-An Campus of Xiamen University. South Xiang-An Rd, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China.
Dan YanXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine; Eye Institute of Xiamen University; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-An Campus of Xiamen University. South Xiang-An Rd, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China.
Mingyan WeiXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine; Eye Institute of Xiamen University; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-An Campus of Xiamen University. South Xiang-An Rd, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China.
Ke YanXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine; Eye Institute of Xiamen University; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-An Campus of Xiamen University. South Xiang-An Rd, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China.
Ruochen WangXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine; Eye Institute of Xiamen University; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-An Campus of Xiamen University. South Xiang-An Rd, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China.
Jiaoyue HuXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine; Eye Institute of Xiamen University; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-An Campus of Xiamen University. South Xiang-An Rd, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China.
Wei LiXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine; Eye Institute of Xiamen University; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-An Campus of Xiamen University. South Xiang-An Rd, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China.
Zuguo LiuXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center; Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine; Eye Institute of Xiamen University; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-An Campus of Xiamen University. South Xiang-An Rd, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005, China. zuguoliu@xmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to investigate the effects of preservative-free latanoprost on meibomian gland function in mice and its possible mechanism.

methodsDisproportionality analysis was conducted using the FAERS database to evaluate adverse reaction reports and epidemiological characteristics associated with preservative-free latanoprost. In mouse models, 0.005% preservative-free latanoprost or vehicle control was topically applied four times daily for 7, 14, or 28 days. Morphological changes of the meibomian gland in mice were detected by immunohistochemistry. Immunofluorescence staining, western blotting, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) were used to assess the expression of the prostaglandin F2α receptor (FP), inflammatory cells and mediators, oxidative stress-related markers, and signaling pathway–related factors in mouse meibomian gland tissues.

resultsReports of adverse reactions caused by preservative-free latanoprost increased annually in the FAERS database. Locally applied preservative-free latanoprost in mice led to an escalation of mucous secretion at the eyelid margin, accompanied by meibomian gland duct obstruction, lipid accumulation in glandular acini, an elevation in the expression levels of FP and Slco2a, and a reduction in the expression levels of PGDH within the meibomian glands. Other inflammatory markers, including CCL2, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and CXCL5, were significantly upregulated in the latanoprost-treated group, showing approximately 1.3–1.5-fold increases in CCL2, IL-1β, TNF-α, and CXCL5, and a more pronounced ~4-fold increase in IL-6 (p < 0.05). Consistently, oxidative stress-related proteins NOX4, 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT), and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) were significantly increased (~1.3–1.5-fold, p < 0.05), whereas the antioxidant proteins superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) and Keap-1 were significantly altered, with SOD2 decreased to ~0.6-fold and Keap-1 increased to ~1.2-fold compared with controls (p < 0.05). Additionally, the Erk and NF-κB signaling pathways were significantly activated.

conclusion0.005% preservative-free latanoprost induces meibomian gland dysfunction in mice by promoting inflammatory responses and oxidative stress. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsLatanoprostMeibomian Gland DysfunctionMeibomian GlandsAnimalsFemaleInflammationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOxidative StressPreservatives, PharmaceuticalReceptors, ProstaglandinSignal TransductionAntihypertensive AgentsLatanoprostPreservatives, Pharmaceuticalprostaglandin F2alpha receptorReceptors, ProstaglandinFAERSInflammationLatanoprostMeibomian gland dysfunctionOcular surface damage

Identifiers

PMID41580829
PMCPMC12910940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.