Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41580827›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2026

Construction of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting gestational diabetes mellitus based on 45 dietary nutrients.

Zhihui Xiong, Yi Yuan, Zhouhui Yun, Lijie Li, Yunmeng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhihui XiongObstetrical Department, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, 310007, China.
Yi YuanObstetrical Department, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, 310007, China.
Zhouhui YunObstetrical Department, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, 310007, China.
Lijie LiObstetrical Department, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, 310007, China. 147406773@qq.com.
Yunmeng ChenObstetrical Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China. chenymhaha@163.com.

Funding

Zhejiang Provincial Mindray Medical Joint Exploratory Project MRY26H200026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using 45 dietary nutrients and baseline data.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 3,649 pregnant women from the NHANES database (2007–2018). Baseline data (age, race/ethnicity, BMI, etc.) and 45 dietary nutrients were collected. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied after the train-test split to address class imbalance. Feature selection used Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) to reduce multicollinearity and the Boruta algorithm to identify core predictors. Six ML models (XGBoost, LightGBM, RF, SVM, GNB, KNN) were trained. Performance was evaluated via AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F-Beta score (β = 2), and PR-AUC. SHAP analysis clarified feature importance.

resultsCore predictors included race/ethnicity, BMI, protein, dietary fiber, α-carotene, β-carotene, lutein/zeaxanthin, folate (DFE), calcium, phosphorus, zinc, potassium, alcohol intake, educational level, and smoking status. XGBoost performed best in the validation set (accuracy: 93.1%, F-Beta: 0.943, AUC: 0.966, sensitivity: 97.5%, specificity: 86.7%, PR-AUC: 0.967), followed by LightGBM (accuracy: 92.6%) and RF (accuracy: 91.4%). GNB was poorest (accuracy: 57.3%, AUC: 0.658). SHAP identified educational level, race/ethnicity, lycopene, and smoking status as top contributors.

conclusionML models integrating demographics and 45 dietary nutrients accurately predict GDM. XGBoost, LightGBM, and RF excel, with XGBoost being most effective, supporting early GDM detection in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Dietary nutrientsGestational diabetes mellitusMachine learningPredictive modelSHAP analysisXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41580827
PMCPMC12874857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.