ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2026
Following the youth patient journey in the mental health help-seeking process in Bogotá, Colombia.
Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding help-seeking behaviors of young people with mental health concerns is crucial for developing responsive mental health services and policies. This study aimed to explore the help-seeking journeys of Colombian youth, the formal and informal services they reached out to when faced with psychological distress and the order in which these services were consulted. Additionally, it examined the differences between pathways of actual service users and those modeled by fictional characters.
methodsThis study employed a mixed-methods design to explore help-seeking behaviors among Colombian youth (ages 10-19) facing mental health concerns, with a focus on service usage, sequence of access, and differences between actual (Clinical Sample, CLS) and perceived pathways (Community Sample, COS). The methodology combined semi-structured interviews, visual journey mapping, and social network analysis (SNA) to capture both qualitative and quantitative dimensions.
results30 young people (53% female, median age = 16, IQR = 3) participated in interviews, of which 19 disclosed past service usage (CLS) and 11 narrated hypothetical scenarios (COS). The findings revealed the absence of a 'typical' care seeking pathway. A trend, however, was observed of prioritizing informal services, such as friends and family, as an initial step in help-seeking behavior. CLS participants reported longer and more complex service pathways, averaging 14.7 services, often involving specialists such as psychiatrists and other medical specializations, with third-party involvement (e.g., parents, educators) in initiating contact. Hypothetical journeys were shorter, with a median of 8 services, always initiated by the characters, and mostly resolved within community settings, with educators and psychologists as key sources of support. In both groups, the primary objective of help-seeking was symptom reduction; however, actual service users took two times longer (Mdn = 120, IQR = 700) to seek helpfrom the onset of symptoms than those projected on fictional characters (Mdn = 60 days, IQR = 90).
conclusionsThe study demonstrates the importance of informal support systems regardless of youth's past service usage and help-seeking experience. It also reveals discrepancies between how help-seeking is perceived and experienced showing an underestimation of the complexity involved in finding mental health support which could potentially explain delays in help initiation and difficulties in navigating support resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.