ArticleBMC medical education2026
Impact of inpatient volume on residents' In-training examination scores and burnout in Japanese community hospitals: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal hospital size between adequate clinical training and resident well-being remains underexplored, particularly within Japan’s unique medical training environment. This study examined the relationship between residents’ nationwide General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE®) scores and their mental health to evaluate the validity of inpatient volume as a criterion for training hospital designation.
methodWe conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study of 7,498 postgraduate year (PGY)-1 and PGY-2 residents from 608 community-based hospitals in Japan who participated in the GM-ITE® from January 17 to 30, 2024. The GM-ITE® is a highly reliable test for evaluating residents’ basic clinical skills. The 2023 GM-ITE® included 80 multiple-choice questions with a maximum score of 80. In the Mini Z 2.0 survey, a score of 3 or more was defined as the presence of burnout symptoms. Training facilities were categorized into four groups by yearly inpatient volume: Very Low (< 3,000), Low (3,000–5,999), Moderate (6,000–9,999), and High (≥ 10,000). We explored the relationships using multivariable analysis between GM-ITE® score, burnout symptoms, and training environment.
resultThe GM-ITE® scores in the Very Low-Volume group were significantly higher than those of the Low-Volume group (45.8 ± 7.3 vs. 44.3 ± 7.1; adjusted coefficient (AC): 2.007; p = 0.021), but did not differ significantly from those of the Moderate- (45.8 ± 7.3 vs. 44.9 ± 6.7; AC: 1.637; p = 0.060) or High-Volume (45.8 ± 7.3 vs. 46.2 ± 6.9; AC: 1.638; p = 0.082) groups. The prevalence of burnout symptoms among residents in the Very Low-Volume group, did not differ significantly from that of residents in the Low- (13.5% vs. 13.1%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.974; p = 0.940), Moderate- (13.5% vs. 12.8%; aOR: 0.967; p = 0.923), and High-Volume groups (13.5% vs. 12.1%; aOR: 0.994; p = 0.986).
conclusionResidents at Very Low-Volume hospitals achieve comparable GM-ITE® scores and mental health outcomes to those of residents at larger hospitals. Even Very Low-Volume hospitals are individually assessed, and if recognized as having an educational environment where residents can acquire basic clinical skills, it may be appropriate to certify them as core clinical training hospitals. The educational environment in Very Low-Volume hospitals could be enhanced by supporting residents’ mental health and advancing international clinical training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.