SynthesisParasites & vectors2026
From flyways to foci: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of birds in the maintenance and global dispersal of ticks and tick-borne pathogens.
Synthesis in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBirds (Aves) are considered to play important roles in the dissemination of ticks and tick-borne pathogens, yet the global extent of their contribution to vector maintenance and long-distance dispersal remains poorly quantified. This study provides a comprehensive global synthesis of bird-associated ticks (BATs) and bird-associated tick-borne pathogens (BATBPs) to characterize the epidemiological roles of birds and assess the resulting public health and biosecurity risks.
methodsWe systematically searched multiple bibliographic databases and GenBank up to February 2025 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Field-based studies reporting bird-tick-pathogen associations were included. Thematic maps showing the geographical distributions of birds, BATs, and BATBPs were produced in ArcGIS, and pooled infestation prevalence was estimated via logit-transformed random-effects meta-analysis with the Hartung-Knapp adjustment.
resultsOur synthesis of 772 studies and 86 molecular records identified 185 BAT species and 102 BATBPs across 34 avian orders, representing 77.3% of all global orders. Within the BATBP spectrum, 53.9% are zoonotic, and 99 tick species have documented records of human-biting. Passeriformes (songbirds) hosted the greatest tick diversity (129 species), while Galliformes exhibited the highest pooled infestation prevalence (17.6%; n = 29 studies, m = 18,746 birds). Globally, allochthonous tick records showed relatively high spatial overlap with the Black Sea-Mediterranean and East Atlantic flyways. Critically, we identified a profound surveillance imbalance in Asia, which accounts for only 6.5% of sampling coordinates (26/397 sites) despite exhibiting a high diversity of emerging pathogens.
conclusionsBirds serve as important contributors to global tick-borne disease epidemiology through local vector maintenance and intercontinental bio-dispersal. They support tick feeding and life-cycle completion and may disperse ticks during migration, facilitating population establishment in new areas. Molecular evidence indicates that birds carry a broad spectrum of tick-borne pathogens; however, the available evidence is largely observational, and experimental validation is required to clarify reservoir competence and transmission. Strengthening integrated One Health surveillance of high-risk hubs, particularly in data-deficient regions such as Asia, is essential to mitigate spillover risk at shifting ecological and migratory interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.