ArticleBMC medicine2026
Potential of earlier primary care health checks for prevention of cardiovascular events in younger age groups: population-based study in the United Kingdom.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncidence of stroke and certain cancers is increasing at younger ages in many high-income countries, prompting healthcare systems to consider how best to improve prevention, such as earlier primary care health checks. We assessed potential barriers to the success of the current proposal in England to reduce the starting age of the 5-yearly NHS health check from 40 to 30 years.
methodsIn a prospective population-based study (Oxford Vascular Study; 1/4/2002-31/3/23) of 94 567 people in a subpopulation of Oxfordshire, UK, we assessed all participants with incident acute vascular events occurring at age 30-44 years and determined the proportion of those who would have qualified for active risk management were they to have had the proposed new health check prior to their event (i.e. premorbid QRISK3-10-year absolute CV-risk ≥ 10%). We also assessed CV-risk relative to age-specific 'ideal' risk (QRISK3-Relative Risk (RR) score, predicted "healthy-heart-age") and number of risk factors above recommended target.
resultsDuring 433,797 person-years of ascertainment, 217 individuals aged 30-44 years had an incident vascular event (crude incidence rate 50/100 000 person years). Of these, 155 would have been eligible for an earlier health check. The median 10-year predicted CV risk in this group was only 2.5% (IQR = 1.1-4.8%), with 148 (95%) falling below the 10% threshold for active risk management. The median 10-year risk among the 49 women was 1.1% (IQR 0.5-2.2%), with none having a predicted risk above the 10% threshold. Yet, the mean predicted "healthy heart age" gap was 9 years(SD = 7), and 137(88%) had at least one treatable risk factor above target level.
conclusionsThe majority of vascular events at age 30-44 years occur in individuals with treatable risk factors above target level, yet the vast majority had falsely reassuring premorbid 10-year CV risks that were well below the 10% threshold for treatment, potentially undermining the effectiveness of earlier primary care health checks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.