ReviewHealth research policy and systems2026
Health initiatives aimed at Indigenous populations in Mexico: a critical perspective.
Review in Health research policy and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGovernmental action in Mexico has sought to understand and address the health situation of Indigenous Peoples (IPs) primarily through an intercultural perspective. However, intercultural approaches focused mainly on cultural aspects may obscure the historical and structural origins of health inequalities. Since the 1980s and during the early years of the new millennium, a series of political and institutional processes shaped a context that was central to incorporating IPs into the national health agenda.
objectiveThe aim of this article is to conduct a critical analysis of health initiatives targeting IPs developed within this context (2000-2012). METHODOLOGY: We carried out a qualitative critical analysis on the basis of a multi-source documentary review to analyse four specific initiatives, selected because they sought to include the participation of Indigenous leaders and explicitly incorporated an intercultural perspective.
resultsThe government-led initiatives APV, PROSANI and EEM reproduced cultural essentialisms through a functional and relational intercultural approach and did not contribute to improving the situation of traditional medicine actors, such as midwives. In contrast the CAMIA initiatives have a community-based origin and, for more than two decades, have been a fundamental space for the health and rights of Indigenous women. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThe incorporation of interculturality in most initiatives appears to respond to a State discourse strategy embedded in narratives of what is considered "politically correct," aimed at legitimizing programs and actions. The perspective from which health initiatives targeting Indigenous Peoples are designed, developed and implemented, as well as the actors involved in these processes and the degree of power and control exercised by both governmental actors and potential users/beneficiaries, determine their transformative potential. Initiatives built upon critical interculturality and with strong community foundations have had a significant impact on health and on other areas of Indigenous women's lives. There is an urgent need to rethink healthcare approaches for Indigenous Peoples in Mexico by adopting more critical intercultural frameworks that enable Indigenous self-determination and decolonial health perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.