Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41580688›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Beyond gratitude: a qualitative investigation of compliment letters received by a neonatology service.

Valérie Clerc, Friedrich Stiefel, Béatrice Schaad, Céline Bourquin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valérie ClercPsychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne, Les Allières, Av. de Beaumont 23, Lausanne-CHUV, 1011, Switzerland. valerie.clerc@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6712-7834
Friedrich StiefelPsychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne, Les Allières, Av. de Beaumont 23, Lausanne-CHUV, 1011, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0326-7918
Béatrice SchaadCenter for Patient, Family and Professional Experiences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 21, Lausanne-CHUV, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4884-2413
Céline BourquinPsychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne, Les Allières, Av. de Beaumont 23, Lausanne-CHUV, 1011, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9584-2929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients’ and relatives’ feedback is used by hospitals to improve the quality and safety of care. It can be solicited, as in the case of satisfaction questionnaires or complaints collected by mediation centers. Hospital users also provide unsolicited feedback by writing compliment letters, which are generally considered as expressions of gratitude. This study investigated compliment letters received by a neonatology service from parents with a twofold objective: first, to investigate compliment letters’ content regarding parents’ experiences and second, to explore underlying needs that motivated parents to provide feedback.

methodsThis qualitative descriptive study was based on the analysis of 573 compliment letters collected by the neonatology service of Lausanne University Hospital in Switzerland between 2009 and 2020. The parents’ lived experiences contained in compliment letters were analyzed using framework analysis. The needs and functions that their feedback fulfilled were examined through a custom analysis method, combining psychological and socio-anthropological perspectives, and informed by the results of the framework analysis.

resultsFive core themes characterized parents’ experiences: recall of the care and hospital stay (contextual information to refer to the children’s stays in the service), life after the hospital discharge (children’s health evolution and development), parents’ feelings (how parents experienced their children’s care), perception of the healthcare professionals (healthcare professionals ways of being and doing), parents’ gratitude (thanks to healthcare professionals for their acts or their qualities). Five underlying needs were identified: thanking the team, closure (claim that the children were no longer patients), partial closure (feedback on the state of the children), taking its own place in the care (parent’s account of the impact of children’s hospitalization), managing the sense of indebtedness (parents’ acknowledgement that they owe something to the team).

conclusionWhen parents write compliment letters, they mostly express how they experienced their children’s hospitalization and how they managed to make sense out of it. Compliment letters thus have other functions than expressing gratitude. They allow parents to sustain relationships with healthcare professionals, support the normalization of their children’s situation and their recovery or provide testimony of experiences. They contain important information about the writers, health care professionals, the relationship they have established, hospital operations and healthcare organization. As hospital users' experiences are thought to contribute to health care quality, it matters that health services consider the information they convey.

Indexed as

Correspondence as TopicFeedbackNeonatologyParentsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchSwitzerlandCompliment lettersGratitudeNeonatologyPatientsSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID41580688
PMCPMC12911175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.