ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Impact of prolonged armed conflict on the patterns of emergency department visits.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Maintaining ambulatory care capacity through telemedicine during wartime: insights from a tertiary center's experience.Israel journal of health policy research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArmed conflicts disrupt health services in nearby regions. While the impact of short-terms wars on hospital activities has been studied, long-term effects of wars on Emergency Department (ED) patterns remain unclear. This study assessed the effect of conflict, followed by organizational changes within the hospital and population evacuation on the profile of ED visits near a war zone.
methodsA time-series analysis was conducted at Galilee Medical Center (GMC), 10-kilometers from Israel’s northern border. Since the onset of Israeli-Hamas war on October 7th, 2023, GMC has operated under missile attacks. Organizational changes were implemented to prepare for mass casualty incidents (MSI) and protect patients and staff. Conflict period (7/10/2023-26/11/2024) was compared with preceding year. Post-ceasefire interval (27/11/2024-6/2/2025) was compared to corresponding pre-conflict period to assess return-to-routine trends. ED data for adult (≥ 18) and pediatric (0–17 years) were extracted from hospital records. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, Poisson, Chi-square tests, with relative-risk confidence intervals were calculated; significance was set at p < 0.05.
resultsDuring conflict period adult ED visits dropped by 13.5% compared to pre-conflict period. Children visits showed sharper decline of 19.5%. ED visits of both adults and children showed partial recovery during post-ceasefire period. The proportion of patients from evacuated localities decreased during the conflict. Among children, urgent visits (triage level 1–3) increased by 80% (RR 1.8 [95% CI, 1.72–1.89; p < 0.0001]), whereas non-urgent visits (triage level 5) decreased by 36% (RR 0.64 [95% CI, 0.63–0.66; p < 0.0001]). ED and Pediatric ED performance metrics improved during the conflict period, though changes weren’t clinically meaningful. Adults’ admission rates decreased by 36% (RR 0.64 [95% CI, 0.63–0.65; p < 0.0001]), and by 35% among children (RR 0.65 [95% CI, 0.62–0.68; p < 0.0001)]. The proportion of in-hospital adult mortality increased during the conflict (RR 1.4 [95% CI, 1.38–1.43; p < 0.0001]).
conclusionsED utilization declined, especially among children, with greater reductions during uncertainty than actual threat. ED performance metrics sustained organizational adaptations, while reduced hospitalization rates were caused by underground operations and preparedness for MSI. The rise in pediatric urgent cases during the conflict, warrants further investigation to better understand underlying causes and plan intervention for future crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.