Trial reportBMC neuroscience2026
Modulating subjective and objective cognitive state fatigue in long COVID with repetitive anodal tDCS: results from a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCognitive fatigue is a frequently reported and debilitating symptom of long COVID, yet effective therapeutic interventions remain limited. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) has been proposed as a promising approach to modulate fatigue-related neural networks. To comprehensively assess cognitive fatigue, the integration of subjective and objective behavioral and electrophysiological measures of induced state fatigue is essential.
methodsThis double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study investigated the effects of four consecutive daily sessions of 30-minute anodal tDCS over the left dlPFC on subjective and objective markers of cognitive state fatigue in individuals with long COVID. The present paper focuses on secondary outcomes, including subjective state fatigue ratings via visual analogue scales, behavioral performance indices, and electrophysiological markers such as temporal alterations of frontal theta and occipital alpha activity as well as p50 sensory gating.
resultsForty participants received either verum or sham tDCS while completing a gamified adaptive Go/No-Go task. Before and after the stimulation period, cognitive state fatigue was reliably induced using the AX-Continuous Performance Task (AX-CPT). Although tDCS did not significantly affect subjective state-fatigue ratings or behavioral performance, our findings indicate that verum stimulation may stabilize fatigue-related changes in occipital alpha power. No immediate stimulation-related improvements were found in the Go/No-Go task.
conclusionsThese findings indicate that while tDCS may modulate neurophysiological correlates of cognitive state fatigue, its impact on subjective experience and behavioral performance remain limited under the current protocol. These results, however, underscore the importance of including neurophysiological endpoints in intervention research and highlight the need for developing more robust and individualized stimulation protocols. Future studies should consider extended stimulation regimens, alternative task paradigms, and more sensitive behavioral measures to further elucidate the neuromodulatory potential of tDCS in long COVID-related cognitive fatigue.
trial registrationdrks.de Identifier: DRKS00031294, date of registration: 17.02.2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.