Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41580568›Full record

Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Effectiveness and safety of pegylated filgrastim (Pelgraz®) for the prevention of febrile neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy in all-day practice in Germany.

Tilman Steinmetz, Peter Jungberg, Dagmar Guth, Jan Knoblich, Thomas Fietz, Thomas Göhler, Marcel Reiser, Uwe Totzke, Katharina Bernhardt

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tilman SteinmetzOutpatient Clinic in Cologne, Cologne, Germany. steinmetz@oncokoeln.de.
Peter JungbergOutpatient Clinic in Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Dagmar GuthOutpatient Clinic in Plauen, Plauen, Germany.
Jan KnoblichOutpatient Clinic in Lörrach, Lörrach, Germany.
Thomas FietzOutpatient Clinic in Singen, Singen, Germany.
Thomas GöhlerOutpatient Clinic in Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Marcel ReiserOutpatient Clinic in Frechen, Frechen, Germany.
Uwe TotzkeTotzke & Dreher Scientific (TDS), Basel, Switzerland.
Katharina BernhardtFormer Accord Healthcare, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFebrile neutropenia (FN) is a common side effect of chemotherapy. It may be prevented by granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF), requiring customization based on patients' risk factors, the type of cancer and chemotherapy, and the formulation used. This observational study investigated all-day use of a pegfilgrastim formulation, also available for self-administration.

methodsIn outpatient clinics across Germany, doctors recorded data of adult patients suffering from a malignant disease routinely treated with chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim.

resultsOverall, 1636 patients received pegfilgrastim, predominantly women suffering from yet untreated breast cancer, 62% being at moderate and 38% at high risk of FN. In total, 2.5% of patients experienced FN despite treatment with pegfilgrastim, with 52.5% requiring hospitalization; in 40%, subsequent chemotherapy had to be postponed or reduced in dose. FN incidence and hospitalization rates were slightly lower when pegfilgrastim was given for primary versus secondary prophylaxis whereas there was no difference when given on day 1 or any later day following chemotherapy. FN incidence was much higher in patients with hematological as compared to solid tumors, particularly when treated with BEACOPP regimens. By contrast, related hospitalization depended less on cancer type and chemotherapy. Pegfilgrastim counterbalanced patients' risk factors, but a previous FN episode and male sex still increased the risk of hospitalization. Overall, 13.4% of patients experienced infections. The most common side effect of pegfilgrastim was bone-related pain. The syringe and self-injector formulations showed comparable effectiveness and safety.

conclusionsPegfilgrastim (Pelgraz®) treatment appeared to be effective and safe in all-day practice.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsChemotherapy-Induced Febrile NeutropeniaFebrile NeutropeniaGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorNeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFilgrastimGermanyHospitalizationHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorpegfilgrastimPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant ProteinsFebrile neutropeniaNeutropeniaPegfilgrastim

Identifiers

PMID41580568
PMCPMC12831665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.