Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41580567›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning application in colon cancer treatment outcome prediction.

Hadi Ghasemi, Seyed Vahid Hosseini, Abbas Rezaianzadeh, Ali Reza Safarpour, Hajar Khazraei, Pooneh Mokarram, Mozhdeh Zamani, Seyed Ali Nabavizadeh, Alimohammad Bananzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hadi GhasemiHIV/AIDS Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyed Vahid HosseiniColorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Abbas RezaianzadehColorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Ali Reza SafarpourColorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hajar KhazraeiColorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Pooneh MokarramAutophagy Research Center, Department of Biochemistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mozhdeh ZamaniAutophagy Research Center, Department of Biochemistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyed Ali NabavizadehHIV/AIDS Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Alimohammad BananzadehColorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. bananzadeh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-2294

Funding

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 29200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colon cancer represents a significant global health burden, accounting for a substantial portion of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Many studies have been conducted to predict survival outcomes; however, most of these analyses have been performed predominantly via basic statistical methods. The aim of this study was to perform machine learning techniques to build models for survival prediction in patients with colon cancer. A retrospective review of 764 colon cancer patients treated over a 10-year period facilitated the construction of a detailed dataset containing 44 predictor variables and one dependent variable, the survival status of the patients (alive or dead). The data were randomly split into 80% training and 20% testing sets. Prognostic features from the database were used to build machine learning algorithms, including random forest, logistic regression, XGBoost, gradient boosting, categorical boosting (CatBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) to predict progressive disease outcomes. Models were validated for sensitivity, accuracy and specificity, with predictive ability assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) calculations. In terms of model accuracy and precision, almost all algorithms produced similar outcomes; however, among the evaluated models, CatBoost achieved the highest accuracy of 0.813, and the random forest model demonstrated the best precision of 0.727, whereas the logistic regression model exhibited the highest recall of 0.658 on the test set. Our results revealed that the random forest algorithm exhibited the highest AUC of 0.83, demonstrating remarkable efficacy in achieving an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity. In summary, this research highlights the potential of machine learning models to support personalized and timely interventions for colon cancer patients, ultimately aiming to improve patient care and outcomes.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsMachine LearningAlgorithmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesROC CurveArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkCancerColon cancerMachine learning algorithm

Identifiers

PMID41580567
PMCPMC12905234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.