Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41580566›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026

High-resolution 3D-printed insulator-based dielectrophoresis devices for biomolecular manipulation.

Mukul Sonker, Mohammad Towshif Rabbani, Samira Mahmud, Jorvani Cruz Villarreal, Domin Koh, Raimund Fromme, Alexandra Ros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mukul SonkerSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5816-8410
Mohammad Towshif RabbaniSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Samira MahmudSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Jorvani Cruz VillarrealSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6762-7348
Domin KohSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Raimund FrommeCenter for Applied Structural Discovery, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Alexandra RosSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. alexandra.ros@asu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7709-8331

Funding

Fractionating Organelle Subpopulations by Size and Type: Improved organelle separation toolsR01GM127562 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI ROS, ALEXANDRA · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127562NIH HHS R01GM127562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancement of microfluidics has enabled a wide range of biochemical and biological applications, such as high-throughput drug testing or point-of-care diagnostics, and has also enabled dielectrophoretic applications. Dielectrophoresis (DEP) is based on the movement of polarizable particles in a non-uniform electric field. Implementing insulator-based dielectrophoresis (iDEP) in microfluidic systems has provided a new dimension for the precise manipulation of biomolecules. However, iDEP has been hampered due to the often cumbersome and expensive microfabrication methods that are required, especially for sub-µm analytes, including biomolecules, since extremely large electric field gradients are needed to achieve successful iDEP manipulation. In recent years, 3D printing has drawn attention in microfluidics, alleviating several issues with cleanroom-based fabrication methods. Among the 3D printing repertoire, two-photon polymerization (2PP) is a novel 3D printing technique that offers unique capabilities with unprecedented resolution compared to standard stereolithography. Here, we report the first iDEP-based manipulation of biomolecules, namely, λ-DNA and Phycocyanin, within a completely 3D-printed microfluidic device realized with 2PP printing. iDEP microfluidic devices with different post geometries were 3D-printed and developed with a gap resolution down to 2 µm using the IP-S photoresist. Furthermore, sub-micrometer spatial resolution was achieved down to 800 nm using the IP-Dip photoresist. Additionally, a numerical model was developed to determine the electric field gradients, DEP trapping force, and infer the associated polarizability and DEP characteristics of the analytes. This 3D printing technology may offer impactful potential for rapid prototyping of novel iDEP microdevices and the opportunity to explore iDEP for various biomolecular applications in the future.

Indexed as

DNA, ViralElectrophoresisLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesPrinting, Three-DimensionalBacteriophage lambdaEquipment DesignDNA, Viral3D-printingCOMSOLDNAMicrofluidicsProteinTwo-photon polymerization

Identifiers

PMID41580566
PMCPMC13388432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.