ArticleScientific reports2026
Influence of paper mill sludge ash on mechanical, microstructural and durability properties of metakaolin based geocrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An experimental and computational intelligence simulation for predicting the strength accuracy of self-compacting concrete using Linz-Donawitz Slag as industrial waste derivatives.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of graphene nanoplatelets on the behaviour of cementitious compounds: an experimental investigation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of Paper Mill Sludge Ash (PMSA) on the mechanical, microstructural, and durability properties of metakaolin-based geocrete. Metakaolin (MK) was partially substituted with PMSA at varying levels (5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%), with mixes designed at alkali activator/binder (A/B) ratios of 0.40 and 0.45. The geocrete specimens were synthesized using 8 M sodium hydroxide under ambient curing (24 to 26 °C) conditions in the entire study. Mechanical properties were assessed through compressive, split tensile, and flexural strength tests, while microstructural analysis was conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Durability performance was examined through rapid chloride penetration (RCPT), water absorption, and porosity tests. The G6 mix, prepared with an A/B ratio of 0.45, consistently demonstrated higher mechanical strength than the G2 mix with an A/B ratio of 0.40, indicating that an increased A/B ratio accelerates the geopolymerization process, enhancing strength development. SEM analysis confirmed this strength improvement, which can be ascribed to the formation of a dense matrix in G6 mixes. The G2 and G6 mix exhibited superior durability, with RCPT values of 1521 and 1414 coulombs, water absorption rates of 2.8% and 2.5%, and porosity levels of 11.73% and 11.58%, respectively. The findings suggest that incorporating 10% PMSA in geocrete formulations provides a viable, low-carbon alternative to cement concrete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.