Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41580538›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Absolute Bioavailability of Oxaliplatin After Intraperitoneal Administration by Electrostatic Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (ePIPAC): Systemic Pharmacokinetics of the CRC-PIPAC-II Trial.

Teun B M van den Heuvel, Paulien Rauwerdink, Emma Hulshof, Vincent C J van de Vlasakker, Dirk Jan A R Moes, Giulia Pluimakers, Koen P B Rovers, Geert-Jan Creemers, Pim J W A Burger, Simon W Nienhuijs and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Teun B M van den HeuvelDepartment of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. teun.vd.heuvel@catharinaziekenhuis.nl.
Paulien RauwerdinkDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Emma HulshofDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Vincent C J van de VlasakkerDepartment of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Dirk Jan A R MoesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Giulia PluimakersDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Koen P B RoversDepartment of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Geert-Jan CreemersDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Pim J W A BurgerDepartment of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Simon W NienhuijsDepartment of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
René J WiezerDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Robin J LurvinkDepartment of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Djamila BoermaDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Ignace H J T De HinghDepartment of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maarten J DeenenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) offers a localized palliative treatment option for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM), often combined with systemic therapy to maximize anti-tumor efficacy. This study on the pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin-based PIPAC with electrostatic precipitation (ePIPAC-OX) aimed to determine the absolute bioavailability of oxaliplatin in plasma after ePIPAC-OX with reference to systemic therapy and to gain insights for optimizing therapy.

methodsThis analysis included patients of the recently published CRC-PIPAC-II study, who received three cycles of oxaliplatin-based systemic therapy and ePIPAC-OX for unresectable CPM. Whole-blood and plasma ultrafiltrate samples were collected at five to six time points after both intravenous oxaliplatin and ePIPAC-OX. Pharmacokinetics were analyzed using population modeling. Absolute bioavailability was calculated as the fraction of the Area under the Curve (AUC0-∞) of the systemic oxaliplatin exposure after intraperitoneal administration over the AUC after intravenous administration, corrected for the dose.

resultsThe study included 18 patients, mostly treated with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and bevacizumab (15 patients). The median dose-uncorrected AUC of systemic oxaliplatin and ePIPAC-OX in plasma was 165.2 μg*h/mL and 57.4 μg*h/mL, respectively. The median bioavailability of the total concentration and free fraction of oxaliplatin after ePIPAC-OX were both 48 % (interquartile range [IQR] 42-57 %). Dose reduction due to toxicity was required for eight patients (44 %). All the included patients experienced short-term symptoms of acute sensory neuropathy, with eight cases occurring after ePIPAC-OX.

conclusionThis is the first study to examine the absolute bioavailability of oxaliplatin administered by ePIPAC-OX in humans, using intra-patient data as a control measurement. The systemic bioavailability of oxaliplatin was substantial after ePIPAC-procedures. Therefore, ePIPAC-OX cannot be considered as solely a local treatment. Future research should take this into account for patients treated with both systemic chemotherapy and ePIPAC-OX as bidirectional therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsColorectal NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsPressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol ChemotherapyAdultAerosolsAgedArea Under CurveBevacizumabBiological AvailabilityCapecitabineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedAerosolsBevacizumabCapecitabineOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinBioavailabilityColorectal cancerOxaliplatinPalliative systemic chemotherapyPeritoneal metastasesPharmacokineticsPIPACToxicity

Identifiers

PMID41580538
PMCPMC12982276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.